The Pinnacle: March 2026
March 2 0 2 6 • I S S U E 63
April Markets & Economic Overview (Q1 2026 review lens)
April 2026 began with markets still operating in a headline-driven regime, but the story is clearer with the benefit of Q1 context. Rising Middle East tensions materially disrupted oil and gas supply expectations, pushing investors to refocus on upside inflation risks and triggering late-quarter volatility across both equities and bonds. In Q1, the broad Bloomberg Commodity Index was the top-performing major asset class (+24.4%), and Brent’s +63% jump in March was described as the largest monthly increase in four decades—showing how energy became the main transmission channel into inflation expectations and rates.
U.S. Markets
Q1 in the US was characterised by a combination of valuation scrutiny and a late-quarter macro shock. The S&P 500 fell 4.3% in Q1 2026, and tech faced renewed scrutiny as investors questioned the durability of parts of the software model under new AI capabilities and assessed hyperscaler returns relative to rising AI capex. The tech sector was down 3.8% in March versus -5.0% for the wider U.S. market, reflecting relative resilience early in the conflict period. On the rates side, U.S. Treasuries were flat over Q1, and JPM argues the U.S. is relatively insulated as a net energy exporter, with a cooling labour market helping contain pressures.
Eurozone
Europe was more directly exposed to the energy shock that defined late Q1. The MSCI Europe ex-UK Index fell 2.3% in Q1, as higher geopolitical tensions and rising gas prices weighed on Europe’s growth outlook. Reuters’ March PMI reporting aligns with that sensitivity: euro zone growth slowed to a nine-month low as costs surged, demand weakened, and prices charged rose sharply.
UK
The UK was a good example of “commodity sensitivity as a cushion, but inflation sensitivity as a risk.” The FTSE All-Share returned +2.4% in Q1, supported by its commodity tilt and a weaker sterling tailwind. UK Gilts were down 2.0% in Q1, highlighting the UK’s relatively high dependence on natural gas as a vulnerability to upside inflation risks after the energy shock. UK services firms saw the largest monthly increase in input costs since 2021 in March, alongside a sharp slowdown in activity and weaker optimism linked to energy and transport cost pressures.
Asia
Asia’s Q1 outcomes were uneven, reinforcing the case for selectivity. The export-oriented TOPIX was the best-performing major equity market in Q1 (+3.6%), supported by yen weakness and political developments that increased expectations for growth-boosting stimulus. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index fell 0.1% in Q1,highlightingAsia’s sensitivity to Hormuz disruption given that more than 80% of global oil and gas flowing through the Strait of Hormuz is destined for Asia. The MSCI Asia ex-Japan fell 1.1% in Q1.
Commodities & cross-asset
Commodities were the defining signal in Q1, and the energy move also influenced other areas: grain prices rose as the Strait of Hormuz is an important route for commodities critical to food production. The equity style backdrop also shifted, with value stocks (+1.3%) outperforming growth stocks (-8.4%) in Q1. Emerging market equities (-0.1%) outperformed developed market equities (-3.5%) in Q1, despite being challenged by Middle East events.
Conclusion
Q1 2026 was a reminder that macro regimes can change quickly: when geopolitics drives energy, it can rapidly reshape inflation risk and the policy debate, increasing volatility across both equities and bonds. April begins with the same framework still in place, but the pathway to a more constructive market tone is also clear- cooling energy stress, stabilising inflation expectations, and a return to fundamentals such as earnings resilience and pricing power.
2. Energy Shocks: Why They Matter (and why markets often adapt)
March 2026 was a reminder that energy is more than a commodities story: it can quickly influence inflation expectations, interest rates, and equity leadership. In Q1, commodities led performance, and Brent’s sharp March rise illustrated how quickly energy can transmit into inflation expectations and market pricing. The key point is that the market impact depends less on the initial spike and more on whether it creates persistent second-round effects that change behaviour - wage demands, pricing decisions, and longer-run inflation expectations.
A constructive takeaway is that energy shocks do not automatically unanchor expectations. Reuters reporting on Dallas Fed research suggested that even with a large oil-trade disruption, long-term inflation expectations may remain largely stable. This helps preserve policy credibility and reduces the risk of a permanent “higher inflation” regime. In practice, that is one reason these episodes often lead to dispersion rather than uniform damage: businesses with pricing power, resilient demand, and strong balance sheets can navigate higher input costs more effectively than those with weaker margins or higher financing sensitivity.
For investors, the goal in a March-style shock is not to forecast every headline. It is to stay anchored to fundamentals and watch the signposts that matter most: energy price volatility, inflation expectations, and central bank communication. When those stabilise, risk premia can compress and markets can refocus on earnings and cash flows rather than macro fear.
Sources:
J.P. Morgan Asset Management – Monthly Market Review
Reuters – Euro Zone Growth Slows to Nine-Month Low as Surging Costs Hit PMI
Reuters – UK Services Firms Report Surge in Costs as Iran War Hurts Optimism
Reuters – Iran War May Boost Inflation but Not Expectations, Dallas Fed Research Shows